ALERT

 ATTENTION !

Due to the Animal Right Extremists, Our rights to have pets are being threatened!

 

Illinois Bill "Anti Puppy Mill"
  sounds good, right ? Well in fact it is an "Anti-Breed Bill ".
 

   They Say "Anti-Puppy Mill" and people hear this and think, well this must be good. The bill could change the next week and say that they will be coming after your Parents, Grand Parents and
Children.  Because people only hear or see the "Anti Puppy Mill" part they automatically support it.
   Well when they come and get your Family it's too late because you didn't look at what they were really after!
   That will be your fault because you didn't listen to the warning from those who know what they were really after  !!!
   They are tricking a lot of people. Please look at the entire Bill before believing any of this. 
   One by One HSUS, SPCA and PETA get one step closer to their goal. These groups play on the "Puppy Mill" phrase to get people to donate money to them.

Where does your Money go ? 

Watch this video

This is money that DOES NOT GO to help the animals in pounds.  Most of the Local Humane Societies and Dog Pounds are not part of this true scam.  If only the donations did go to help them it would be wonderful, but the money instead goes to  kill animals and eliminate them all together. Please, if you love your pets and want your Grand Children along with their off spring to be able to as well. Then We need to WAKE UP, Stand Up and follow what these groups are doing.  Let your Senators and Representatives know that we want these GROUPS STOPPED!  HSUS, SPCA and PETA want you to think that All Breeders are Puppy Mills.  You need to be educated as to their real agenda and the real TRUTH!

------------------------------------------------------------

Oppose this Illinois Bill HB 0198 and its Clone SB 0053
 

So we are thinking...This Bill does not effect Me, right? Wrong!  Think again!  You may think everyone else will stop this without your Help? Sorry! This will NOT work !  It will because:

This will make people who have only 1 pair of dogs be able to sell pups for high prices. With no health guarantee , No concern for long term health.

Because the Breeders will have to spend BIG BUCKS to have the buildings built and pens made of GOLD (rust proof) or replace them ever year, Yes that's right, how else can we keep then from rusting?

Then ad heat, air conditioning. The new Power washer that heats to 150 to 180 degrees.  So now there is more power and water bills. We will also have to have lets say $20 - $30,000 on hand in case they want to fine us because there is dog hair in the dog beds.  So you can see where the price of pups are going to go, right ?

Well in turn this is also just another step closer to the true Agenda of what these Groups  are  working for. They want to abolish Pets all together. They have no problem admitting it if you would just check them out and do some research on them.

That's RIGHT ! No PETS for ANY ONE

Please Call, Write or email your Reps and oppose these Bills and others like them.

Please take Time to view the links below, please !

  HB 0198    <--- See this Bill

------------------------------------------------------------

Quotes from Animal Rights Activists

“We have no ethical obligation to preserve the different breeds of
livestock produced through selective breeding. One generation and out. We have
no problem with the extinction of domestic animals. They are creations of human
selective breeding.”   Wayne Pacelle, Senior VP of Humane Society of the US,
formerly of Friends of Animals and Fund for Animals, Animal People, May, 1993.

“I don’t have a hands-on fondness for animals…To this day I don’t
feel bonded to any non-human animal. I like them and I pet them and I’m kind to
them, but there’s no special bond between me and other animals.” Wayne Pacelle,
of the Humane Society of the United States, quoted in Bloodties: Nature,
Culture and the Hunt by Ted Kerasote, 1993, p. 251.

“Breeders must be eliminated! As long as there is a surplus of
companion animals in the concentration camps referred to as “shelters”, and
they are killing them because they are homeless, one should not be allowed to
produce more for their own amusement and profit. If you know of a breeder in
the Los Angeles area, whether commercial or private, legal or illegal, let us
know and we will post their name, location, phone number so people can write
them letters telling them ‘Don’t Breed or Buy, While Others DIE.’” “Breeders!
Let’s get rid of them too!” Campaign on Animal Defense League’s website, September 2, 2003

“It is time we demand an end to the misguided and
abusive concept of animal ownership. The first step on this long, but just,
road would be ending the concept of pet ownership.” Elliot Katz, President “In
Defense of Animals,” Spring 1997

“In the end, I think it would be lovely if we stopped this whole
notion of pets altogether.” Ingrid Newkirk, national Director, People for the
Ethical Treatment of Animals (PeTA), Newsday, 2/21/88

“I don’t use the word “pet.” I think it’s speciesist
language. I prefer “companion animal.” For
one thing, we would no longer allow breeding. People could not create different
breeds. There would be no pet shops. If people had companion animals in their
homes, those animals would have to be refugees from the animal shelters and the
streets. You would have a protective relationship with them just as you would
with an orphaned child. But as the surplus of cats and dogs (artificially
engineered by centuries of forced breeding) declined, eventually companion
animals would be phased out, and we would return to a more symbiotic
relationship – enjoyment at a distance.” Ingrid Newkirk, national Director,
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PeTA), The
Harper’s Forum Book, Jack Hitt, ed., 1989, p.223.

“Pet ownership is an absolutely abysmal situation brought about by
human manipulation.” Ingrid Newkirk, national Director, People for the Ethical
Treatment of Animals (PeTA), Just Like Us?” Harper’s, August 1988, p. 50.

“Let us allow the dog to disappear from our brick and concrete
jungles–from our firesides, from the leather nooses and chains by which we
enslave it.” John Bryant, Fettered Kingdoms: An Examination of A Changing Ethic
Washington.  People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, (PeTA), 1982, p. 15.

“You don’t have to own squirrels and starlings to get enjoyment from
them … One day, we would like an end to pet shops and the breeding of animals.
[Dogs] would pursue their natural lives in the wild … they would have full
lives, not wasting at home for someone to come home in the evening and pet them
and then sit there and watch TV,” Ingrid Newkirk, national director, People for
the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PeTA), Chicago Daily Herald, March 1, 1990.

“I’m not only uninterested in having children. I am opposed to
having children. Having a purebred human baby is like having a purebred dog; it
is nothing but vanity, human vanity.” Ingrid Newkirk, PeTA’s founder and
president, New Yorker, April 23, 2003.

“The bottom line is that people don’t have the right to manipulate
or to breed dogs and cats … If people want toys, they should buy inanimate
objects. If they want companionship, they should seek it with their own kind,”
Ingrid Newkirk, founder, president and former national director, People for the
Ethical Treatment of Animals (PeTA), Animals, May/June 1993

“Six million people died in concentration camps, but six billion
broiler chickens will die this year in slaughterhouses.” Ingrid Newkirk,
founder, president and former national director, People for the Ethical
Treatment of Animals, as quoted in Chip Brown, “She’s A Portrait of Zealotry in
Plastic Shoes,” Washington Post, November 13, 1983, p. B10.

“We feel that animals have the same rights as retarded human child
because they are equal mentally in terms of dependence on others.” Alex
Pacheco, Director, PETA, New York Times, January 14, 1989

“The life of an ant and that of my child should be granted equal
consideration.” Michael W. Fox, Scientific Director and former Vice President,
The Humane Society of the United States, The Inhumane Society, New York, 1990.

“To those people who say, `My father is alive because of animal
experimentation,’ I say `Yeah, well, good for you. This dog died so your father
could live.’ Sorry, but I am just not behind that kind of trade off.” Bill
Maher, PETA celebrity spokesman.

“Even if animal tests produced a cure [for AIDS], ‘we’d be against it.”
Ingrid Newkirk, national director, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals
 (PeTA), as quoted in Fred Barnes, “Politics,” Vogue, September 1989, p.542.

“Our goal is to get sport hunting in the same category as cock
fighting and dog fighting.” Wayne Pacelle, Senior VP Humane Society of the US
(HSUS), formerly of Friends of Animals and Fund for Animals,(Bozeman
Daily Chronicle, October 8,1991.

“We are going to use the ballot box and the democratic process to
stop all hunting in the United States … We will take it species by species
until all hunting is stopped in California. Then we will take it state by
state. Wayne Pacelle, Senior VP Humane Society of the US (HSUS), formerly of
Friends of Animals and Fund for Animals, Full Cry Magazine, October 1, 1990.

“Eating meat is primitive, barbaric, and arrogant.”
“To give a child animal products is a form of child abuse.” Neal
Barnard, Medical Advisor, PETA, from Bernard’s book, Food For Life.

“Probably everything we do is a publicity stunt … we are not here to
gather members, to please, to placate, to make friends. We’re here to hold the
radical line.” Ingrid Newkirk, PeTA’s president and founder, USA Today, September 3, 1991.

“Humane care (of animals) is simply sentimental, sympathetic patronage.”
 Dr. Michael W. Fox, Humane Society of the US, in 1988 Newsweek interview.

“We would be foolish and silly not to unite with people in the
public health sector, the environmental community, [and] unions, to try to
challenge corporate agriculture.” Wayne Pacelle, Senior VP Humane Society of
the US, formerly of Friends of Animals and Fund for Animals, at the Animal
Rights 2002″ Convention, July 1, 2002.

“If we are not able to bring the churches, the synagogues, [and] the
mosques around to the animal rights view, we will never make large-scale
progress for animal rights in the United States Norm Phelps, Program Director,
Fund for Animals: “Animal Rights 2002″ convention, July 2, 2002

“We are not terrorists, but we are a threat. We are a threat both
economically and philosophically. Our power is not in the right to vote but the
power to stop production. We will break the law and destroy property until we
win.” Dr. Steven Best, speaking at International Animal Rights Gathering 2005.
The Telegram (UK) July 17, 2005
[On the contrary. Some animal rights groups have been deemed domestic terrorist
organizations by the FBI.]

January 26, 2003

Note: Coronado pled guilty to the charges stemming from the 1992 MSU arson
case but even so, PeTA donated $45,200 to the Coronado
Support Committee in 1995. During the previous year, while Coronado
was still on the loose and living underground, PeTA granted a loan (not yet
repaid) to Coronado’s father for $25,000.

“If someone is killing, on a regular basis, thousands of animals,
and if that person can only be stopped in one way by the use of violence, then
it is certainly a morally justifiable solution.” Jerry Vlasak, spokesman for
Animal Defense League, April 1, 2004.

“It is dangerous to engage in even the most innocuous-seeming
discourse with the FBI/ Homeland Security/ a local detective.” Ingrid Newkirk,
PeTA’s founder and president, letter to activists posted on Yahoo, March 17, 2003.

“There are about 2,000 people prepared at any one time to take
action for us … The children [of targeted scientists and executives] are
enjoying a lifestyle built on the blood and abuse of innocent animals. Why
should they be allowed to close the door on that and sit down and watch TV and
enjoy themselves when animals are suffering and dying because of the actions of
the family breadwinner? They are a justifiable target for protest.” Robin Webb,
ALF leader, Sunday Herald (Scotland) Sept. 19, 2004.

“It won’t ruin our movement if someone gets killed in an animal
rights action. It’s going to happen sooner or later. The Animal Liberation
Front, the Earth Liberation Front — sooner or later there’s going to be someone
getting hurt. And we have to accept that fact. It’s going to happen. It’s not
going to hurt our movement. Our movement will go on. And it’s important that we
not let the bully pulpit of the FBI and the other oppression agencies stop us
from what we’re doing. They are the violent ones. They are the terrorists … we
have to keep doing what we’re doing.” Jerry Vlasak, PCRM spokesman and Director
of ADL, speaking at the Animal Rights 2004 convention (July 8-11).

“I don’t think you’d have to kill — assassinate — too many … I think
for 5 lives, 10 lives, 15 human lives, we could save a million, 2 million, 10
million non-human lives.” Jerry Vlasak, Animal Rights 2003 Convention, June, 2003.

“Hit them in their personal lives, visit their homes. Actively
target military establishments within the United States… strike hard and
fast and retreat in anonymity. Select another location, strike again hard and
fast and quickly retreat in anonymity … Do not get caught. DO NOT GET CAUGHT. Do
not get sent to jail. Stay alert, keep active, and keep fighting.” Craig
Rosenbraugh, radical animal rights spokesperson for terrorism and a recipient
of PeTA funds, in Open letter to activists, published on the Independent Media
Center website, March 17, 2003.

“Arson, property destruction, burglary and theft are ‘acceptable
crimes’ when used for the animal cause.” Alex Pacheco, Director,PETA.

“Property destruction is a legitimate political tool called economic
sabotage, and it’s meant to attack businesses and corporations.” David
Barbarash, Spokesperson for the Animal Liberation Front (ALF), NPR radio show
“The Connection” January 7, 2002.

“Damaging the enemy financially is fair game.” Alex Pacheco, animal
rights radical, PeTA co-founder and one of its original 3 board members,
Washington City Paper, December 18, 1987.

“Our nonviolent tactics are not as effective. We ask nicely for
years and get nothing. Someone makes a threat, and it works.” Ingrid Newkirk,
PeTA’s founder and president, US News and World Report, April 8, 2002.

“I openly hope that it [hoof-and-mouth disease] comes here. It will
bring economic harm only for those who profit from giving people heart attacks
and giving animals a concentration camp-like existence. It would be good for
animals, good for human health and good for the environment.” Ingrid Newkirk,
PeTA founder and president, ABC News interview April 2, 2001.

“We have found that civil disobedience and direct action has been
powerful in generating massive attention in our communities … and has been very
effective in traumatizing our targets.” JP Goodwin, Committee to Abolish the
Fur Trade, National Animal Rights Convention ‘97, June 27, 1997, now employed
by the Humane Society of the United States